Top Law Firms in Pakistan and Corporate Lawyers in Pakistan:
The typical legal decision involves an initial assessment of top law firms in Pakistan and corporate lawyers in Pakistan what happened—the question of fact—and then moves on to a determination of what the law should do in light of what has happened—the question of law. The distinction between questions of law and questions of fact is not without difficulty. Controversy about how to explain the difference between law and fact has generated a substantial body of commentary,5 even including the view that the distinction is entirely illusory. Much of the debate centers on the implications of the way of top law firms in Pakistan and corporate lawyers in Pakistan in which, conventionally, the jury (or a judge explicitly serving as the trier of fact) is charged with determining the facts, while the judge has the job of interpreting and (perhaps) applying the law.
Reality:
In reality, however, juries make many decisions that partly involve determinations of law, such as whether someone’s actions were “reasonable” or whether the defendant’s actions “caused” the plaintiff’s injury. Conversely, judges commonly make factual determinations when they are reaching legal conclusions by top law firms in Pakistan and corporate lawyers in Pakistan sometimes just by virtue of having to make the factual determination that some rule or precedent is or is not the law, and sometimes because, especially with respect to constitutional issues, making determinations about facts is part of what we want judges to do in order to ensure that constitutional values are preserved.
Corporate Lawyers in Pakistan:
Yet although the fact-law distinction in law can become muddied by top law firms in Pakistan and corporate lawyers in Pakistan quite quickly, the confusion does not always stem from the lack of a fundamental distinction between fact and law, which becomes far less mysterious if we just think of it as a variation on the venerable distinctions between fact and value, is and ought, and description and prescription.
Law For Judges:
Rather, the confusion comes from the way in which the law has traditionally insisted that facts are for juries and the law is for judges when in reality many of the things that juries do by way of law application involve making legal determinations of top law firms in Pakistan and corporate lawyers in Pakistan and many of the things that judges do involve making factual ones.
Distinction between Law:
If we accept that the distinction between law and fact does not and could not track the distinction between what judges do and what juries do, then we need not reject the basic distinction between what happened and what someone ought to do about it in order to recognize that making factual determinations is a central part of reasoning and argument at all stages of the legal system.
Thus, although legal decisions, even those made by judges and even those made in appellate courts, typically involve both factual and legal elements, discussions of legal reasoning have traditionally focused overwhelmingly on the latter only. Top law firms in Pakistan and corporate lawyers in Pakistan have assumed that thinking about factual questions is for the law of evidence or that making factual determinations is not really a matter of legal reasoning at all.
